VotApedia for Student Engagement in Academic Integrity Education

Authors

  • Chad Habel Centre for Learning and Professional Development, University of Adelaide

Abstract

VotApedia is a form of student response system (SRS) with features which make it highly applicable to the modern classroom. Instead of using ‘clickers’, VotApedia allows educators to pose multiple-choice questions (MCQs) via a website which students then respond to using their mobile phone. While SRSs have been used in a variety of disciplines so far (mostly natural and health sciences), their potential for student development activities such as academic skills is, as yet, untapped. In particular, academic integrity education is a low-assessment but high-stakes context which lends itself to information-transmission models focused on the definitions of and punishments for plagiarism, and conveying strategies for avoiding plagiarism or achieving academic writing. Therefore, VotApedia aims to increase student engagement in academic integrity learning and specifically allow for the correction of misconceptions. This article reports on the implementation of VotApedia in a lecture for international students entitled ‘Plagiarism and Referencing’. The main finding is a positive observed effect on student engagement and specifically the potential for correcting misconceptions. Student responses to questions posed via VotApedia revealed misunderstandings of issues around plagiarism and referencing, especially regarding interpretation of Turnitin reports, and allowed for correction through discussion of these issues. Fifteen student reflections in the form of blogs also indicate high engagement, a high level of appreciation for the use of the technology and unexpected metacognitive activity among students. Strengths and weaknesses of VotApedia are discussed, as well as possibilities for future research. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnett, J. (2006). Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22 (4), 474-494.

Crisp, G. (2009). Interactive e-Assessment: moving beyond multiple-choice questions. Retrieved from http://ipac.kacst.edu.sa/eDoc/2009/173798_1.pdf

Cutts, Q., Kennedy, G., Mitchell, C., & Draper, S. (2004). Maximising dialogue in lectures using Group Response Systems. Proceedings of the7th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. Hawaii, 16-18 August 2004. Retrieved from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~quintin/papers/cate2004.pdf

D’Inverno, R., Davis, H., & White, S. (2003). Using a personal response system for promoting student interaction. Teaching Mathematics and its applications, 22(4), 163-169.

Duggan, P. M., Palmer, E., & Devitt, P. (2007). Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: A randomised trial. BMC Medical Education, 7(25), BioMed Central.

Elliot, C. (2003). Using a personal response system in Economics teaching. International Review of Economics Education, 1(1), 80-86.

Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom Response Systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.

Maier, H. R. (2009). Student participation in lectures using mobile phones. Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, University of Adelaide, 6-9 December, 43-48.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacy approach. Studies in Higher Education, 11(3), 182-199.

McGowan, U. (2005). ‘Does educational integrity mean teaching students NOT to ‘use their own words’?’, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1). Retrieved from http:// www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/index

Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., & D’Lorenzo, T. M. (2008) Efficacy of personal response systems (‘clickers’) in large, introductory Psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 45-50.

Palmer, E. J., Devitt, P. G., De Young, N. J., & Morris, D. (2005), Assessment of an electronic voting system within the tutorial setting: A randomised control trial. BMC Medical Education, 5(24), BioMed Central.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, from On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20 Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 260-272.

Trees, A. R. & Jackson, M. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32 (1), 21-40.

What Plagiarism Looks Like. (2009). Boing Boing Website. Retrieved from http:// boingboing.net/2009/06/01/what-plagiarism-look.html

Walsh, A. (2009). Text messaging (SMS) and libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 8, 9-11. Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be... The use of a personal response system in Statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3(2), 14-20.

Downloads

Published

2011-02-26

Issue

Section

Articles