acilitating active learning with international students: what worked and what didn’t

Authors

  • David Qian Faculty of Higher Education Lilydale, Swinburne University of Technology

Abstract

This paper explores the efficacy of applying active learning methods in tutorials for international students. First it looks at the way that tutorials were being conducted and discusses their inadequacies and the need for change. The paper then describes some of the different activities that were used to involve the students in a more active form of learning. The positive feeling of the tutor regarding the change was confirmed by the feedback from the students to a questionnaire. The paper argues that despite the language difficulties and a tradition of rote learning, international students respond more readily to a variety of more interactive practices, but this cannot happen unless the tutor is prepared to make greater efforts to plan more innovative activities. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aycock, J., & Aycock, A. (2008). Why I Love/Hate Wikipedia: Reflections upon (Not Quite) Subjugated Knowledges. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 92- 101.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.

Bartram, B., & Bailey. C. (2009). Different students, same difference? A comparison of UK and international students’ understandings of ‘effective teaching’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 172-184.

Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.

Braddock, R., Roberts, P., Zheng, C., & Guzman, T., (1995). Survey on skill development in international teaching of international students. Sydney: Macquarie University, Asia Pacific Research Institute.

Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 41 (6/7), 294-304.

Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28, 435-446.

Chickering, A. & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39 (7), 3-7.

Cortazzi, M., &Jin, L. (1996). Cultures of learning: language classrooms in China. In

H. Coleman (Ed.), Society and the Language Classroom (pp. 169-206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creasey, G., Jarvis, P., & Knapcik, E. (2009). A measure to assess student-instructor relationships. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 3(2), 1-10

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953, Vol. 12 (pp. 1-5). Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. (Originally published in 1938.)

Exley, K., & Dennick, R. (2004). Giving a Lecture: From Presenting to Teaching, London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Flowerdew, J. & Miller, L. (1995). On the notion of culture in L2 lectures. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (2), 345-373.

Forestier, K. (1998). Asian crisis spurs lesson in learning. South China Morning Post, 11 August.

Frymier, A. (1993). ‘The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation over the course of a semester’. Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Miami Beach, Florida, 18-21 November.

Fuller, I., Rawlinson, S., & Bevan, R. (2000). Evaluation of student learning experiences in physical geography fieldwork: paddling or pedagogy? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 199-215.

Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the Quality of Student Learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.

Harchar, R. (2005). Mock Interview Strategy: An action research study of administrator and teacher candidates’ preparation for interview field experience. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 33-45.

Healey, M., & Roberts, J. (2004). Engaging Students in Active Learning: Case Studies in Geography, Environment and Related Disciplines. Cheltenham: Geography Discipline Network.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Structuring academic controversy. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods. Westport CT: Greenwood Press. Jones, J., Bell, J., Bush, D., Cotton, F., Galloway, B. & Martina, M. (1993). Survey of the attitudes of teachers to the performance of their international students (Unpublished report), University of Canberra Committee for the Enhancement of Teaching Quality, Canberra.

Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40, 99-121.

Kennedy, R. (2007). In-Class Debates: fertile ground for active learning and the cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 183-190.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Lee, K. S. & Carrasquillo, A. (2006). Korean college students in United States: perceptions of professors and students. College Student Journal, 40(2), 442-457.

Leong, L, (2005). Improving student’s interest in learning: some positive techniques. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(2), 129-132.

Liu, D. (1998). Ethnocentrism in TESOL: teacher education and the neglected needs of international TESOL students. ELT Journal, 52(1), 3-10.

Mahoney, D. (2007). Constructing reflexive fieldwork relationships: narrating my collaborative storytelling methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(4), 573-594.

Meyers, C., & Jones, T. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.

Pianta, R., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33, 444-458.

Race, P. (2002). The Lecturer’s Tool Kit: A Practical Guide to Learning, Teaching and Assessment. London: Kogan Page.

Revell, A., & Wainwright, E. (2009). What makes lectures ‘unmissable’? Insights into teaching excellence and active learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 209-223.

Scott, G. (2006). Accessing the Student Voice: Using CEQuery to identify what retains students and promotes engagement in productive learning in Australian higher education. Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_ education/publications_resources/profiles/access_student_voice.htm.

Tatar, S. (2005). Classroom participation by international students: the case of Turkish graduate students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(4), 337-355.

Tsui, A. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom (pp. 145-167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

University of Virginia. (2006). Structured Academic Controversy. Retrieved from http://curry. virginia.edu/files/nagc_struct_acad_cont.pdf.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weimer, M. (2003). Focus on learning, transform teaching. Change, September/October, Heldref publications.

Witt, P., Wheeless, L., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184-207.

Downloads

Published

2011-02-26

Issue

Section

Articles