Service Excellence Library Project: Improving student and researcher access to teaching and learning resources
This paper describes a project aimed at making library book management processes more efficient in terms of time and staff resources. The ultimate aim was to improve access to a university library’s teaching and learning resources for students and academics alike while maintaining the high levels of library service already established. The paper describes how the Lean Six Sigma approach to process improvement was applied at the main library of a major Australian research university, a large library of over two million items.
Advocates of the Lean Six Sigma approach to process reengineering have wondered whether it is applicable to the complex educational sector or whether it would be feasible to implement the approach in the sector. The success of this first completed Lean Six Sigma project at a major Australian research university shows that Lean Six Sigma approaches to process improvement can work in a university setting, leading to lasting improvements in efficiency. This paper describes the research used to measure and analyse the pre-existing process used for library returns and demonstrates how a 52% reduction in the number of individual process steps involved was achieved. This means that library books and journals are now returned to shelves, on average, point eight (0.8) of a day earlier than they previously were. With a book cycle of about ten days, from initial lending to final return to shelves, this roughly equates to an eight percent improvement in the availability of these teaching and learning resources.
It is interesting to speculate that to achieve the same eight percent increase in availability of resources through an acquisitions program would involve buying 160,000 extra copies of books and journal issues. At an average book cost of $30 each this would be a substantial total. A conclusion of this project is that applying a business oriented philosophy involving Lean Six Sigma techniques to a university is a viable and effective strategy to improve the pace and quality of efficiency improvements in such settings.
Bandyopadhyay, J. K., & Lichtman, R. 2007. Six Sigma Approach to Quality and Productivity Improvement in an Institution for Higher Education in the United States. International Journal of Management, 24(4): 802-807.
Boddy, C. R. 2005. A rose by any other name may smell as sweet but "group discussion" is not another name for a "focus group" nor should it be. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(3): 248-255.
Boddy, C. R. 2008. Focus Group Discussions and Brainstorming: What's the Difference? Australasian Journal of Market and Social Research, 16, 27-35.
Bodie, S. N. 2007. Tips and Suggestions for Six Sigma Project Success. iSixSigma Magazine, September, 2007.
Bossert, J. 2003. Lean and Six Sigma—Synergy Made in Heaven. Quality Progress, 36(7): 31. Box, T. M. 2006. Six Sigma Quality: Experiential Learning. SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075), 71(1): 20-23. Caulcutt, R. 2001. Why is Six Sigma so successful? Journal of Applied Statistics, 28(3/4): 301- 306.
Comm, C. L., & Mathaisel, D., F. X. 2005. An exploratory study of best lean sustainability practices in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 13(3): 227-240.
Comm, C. L., & Mathaisel, D., F. X. 2008. Sustaining higher education using Wal-Mart's best supply chain management practices. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(2): 183-189.
Craven, E. D., Clark, J., Cramer, M., Corwin, S. J., & Cooper, M. R. 2006. NewYork- Presbyterian Hospital uses Six Sigma to build a culture of quality and innovation. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 25(4): 11-19.
Healy, G. 2009. Long way to the top for ranking role, The Australian: Higher Education. Sydney. April 22, 2009.
Hilton, R., Balla, M., & Sohal, A. S. 2008. Factors critical to the success of a Six-Sigma quality program in an Australian hospital. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19(9): 887-902.
Ho, S. L. 2006. Six Sigma and Educational Excellence, IEEE ICMIT 2006 Proceedings: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Vol.2, Singapore, 21-23 June.
Jenicke, L. O., Kumar, A., & Holmes, M. C. 2008. A framework for applying Six Sigma improvement methodology in an academic environment. The TQM Journal, 20(5): 453- 462.
Jiju, A. 2004. Some pros and cons of Six Sigma: an academic perspective. The TQM Magazine, 16(4): 303-306.
Johnson, J. A., Gitlow, H., Widener, S., & Popovich, E. 2006. Designing New Housing at the University of Miami: A "Six Sigma" DMADV/DFSS Case Study. Quality Engineering, 18(3): 299-323.
Krause, T. 2009. Facilitating Teamwork With Lean Six Sigma and Web-Based Technology. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(1): 84-90.
Kumi, S., & Morrow, J. 2006. Improving self service the Six Sigma way at Newcastle University Library. Program: electronic library and information systems, 40(2): 123 - 136.
Llorans-Montes, F. J., & Molina, L. M. 2006. Six Sigma and management theory: Processes, content and effectiveness. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(4): 485- 506.
Pestorius, M. S. 2007. Apply Six Sigma To Sales and Marketing. Quality Progress, 40(1): 19. Raifsnider, R., & Kurt, D. 2004. Lean Six Sigma in higher education: Applying proven methodologies to improve quality, remove waste, and quantify opportunities in colleges and universities. Xerox White Paper. Xerox Global Services.