Allocation of Tertiary Students for Group Work: Methods and Consequences
Abstract
Graduate Quality by most Australian universities. While the benefits of group work are well noted, for some academics, a dilemma exists about methods used to allocate students to groups and the rationales for doing so. This article reports on a review of current literature to describe the different methods available for group selection, the pedagogical rationales which
underpin those selection strategies and the associated teaching and learning outcomes. The major group selection processes identified in the literature include student selection, academic selection, random selection and mixed pair selection. Eleven studies were identified which directly compared two group selection methods in face-to-face teaching at tertiary institutions from electronic databases. Outcomes examined included student satisfaction, academic and affective outcomes and students’ preference for future groupings. The overwhelming finding was that randomly selected groups did not have favourable learning outcomes compared to any other group selection process. Student selected groups had improved student satisfaction and most favourable learning outcomes.
These findings will inform academic’s teaching decisions related to the best
group selection process for achieving their intended learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Alsop, R. (2004). How to get hired., Wall Street Journal,
p. R8. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,
SB109577501492723498,00.html?mod=home_inside_today_us
Applebaum, S. H., Shapiro, B., & Elbaz, D. (1998). The management of multicultural group conflict. Team Performance Management, 4(5), 211-234.
Bacon, D., Stewart, K., & Anderson, E. (2001). Methods of assigning players to teams: a review and novel approach. Simulation and Gaming, 32(1), 6-17.
Bacon, D., Stewart, K., & Silver, W. (1999). Lessons from the best
and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the
difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467-488.
Barfield, R. L. (2003). Students’ perceptions of and satisfaction with
group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 355-370.
Beheshtian-Ardekani, M., & Mahmood, M. A. (1986). Development and validation of a tool for assigning students to groups for class projects. Decision Sciences, 17, 92-113.
Borges, J., Dias, T., & Cunha, J. (2009). A new group-formation method for student projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(6), 573-585.
Bosco, S. M., Jervis, K. J., & Harvey, D. M. (2009). The effect of team selection method on the occurence and nature of conflict. Journal of Applied Research for Business Instruction, 7(1).
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(9), 413-426.
Bourner, J., Hughes, M., & Bourner, T. (2001). First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 19-39.
Chapman, K., Meuter, M., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2006). Can’t we pick our own groups? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes. Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 557-569.
Chapman, K. J., Meuter, M. L., Toy, D., & Wright, L. K. (2010). Are student groups dysfunctional? Perspectives from both sides of the classroom. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), 39-49.
Ciani, K., Summers, J., Easter, M., & Sheldon, K. (2008). Collaborative learning and positive experiences: does letting students choose their own groups matter? Educational Psychology, 28(6), 627-641.
ergo, vol. 3, no.2 9
Connerley, M., & Mael, F. (2001). The importance and invasiveness of student team selection criteria. Journal of Management Education, 25(5), 471-494.
Cronholm, S., & Melin, U. (2006). Project orientated student work: Group formation and learning. Paper presented at the Information Systems Education Conference, Dallas.
Garvin, J., Butcher, A., Stefani, A., Tariq, V., Lewis, N., Blumson, R., Hill, J. (1995). Group projects for first-year university students: an evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), 279-294.
Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365-375.
Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D., & Littig, P. (2010). University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 9-20.
Huxham, M., & Land, R. (2001). Assigning students in group work projects. Can we do better than random? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37(1), 17-22. doi: 10.1080/135580000362043
Kelly, P. (2008). Achieving desirable group-work outcomes through the group allocation process. Team Performance Management, 14(1/2), 22-38.
Lee, P. (2007). Elaborated version of the teaching and learning framework 2007: University of South Australia.
Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (1997). Group learning and group assessment on undergraduate computing courses in higher eduction in the UK: Results of a survey. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), 81-91.
Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2001). Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 61-72.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. [Article]. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585.
Mahenthiran, S., & Rouse, P. J. (2000). The impact of group selection on student performance and satisfaction. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(6), 255-264.
Mello, J. (1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings. Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 253-259.
Muller, T. E. (1989). Assigning students to groups for class projects: An exploratory test of two methods. Decision Sciences, 20(3), 623-634.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. New York: Routledge.
Russell, M. (2010). The formation of effective work groups within an FE classroom. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(2 Supp), 205-221.
Seethamraju, R., & Borman, M. (2009). Influence of group formation choices on academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 31-40.
Strauss, P., & U, A. (2007). Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 147-161.
Strauss, P., U, A., & Young, S. (2011). ‘I know the type of people I work well with’: student anxiety in multicutural group projects. Studies in Higher Education, 02 February iFirst Article, 1-15. Retrieved from http:/dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.488720
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325-341.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Tu, Y., & Lu, M. (2005). Peer ranking and self assessment to reveal the ranking of each individual’s contribution to a group project. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(2), 197-204.
University of Sydney. (2011). Introduction to mapped universities’ statements of graduate attributes Retrieved 14 May 2011, from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/nationalgap/resources/gamap/introduction.htm