AUSTRALIAN LIVE ANIMAL EXPORT: A COMPARATIVE EXAMINATION OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21913/USLRunisaslr.v1i0.1244Abstract
The Australian live animal export trade has long been under scrutiny due to repeated public outcries over the animal welfare abuses that are seemingly intrinsic to the trade. This article examines the regulatory regimes of Australia’s international competitors and asks whether Australian authorities should adopt their solutions to the problem of protecting the welfare of animals who are exported live to other nations. The article begins by providing an overview of the current Australian regulatory framework in Part II. Parts III and IV discuss the approaches taken by two of Australia’s international competitors in the animal export trade, New Zealand and Brazil. Part V examines the merits of a proposed international treaty governing animal welfare worldwide and asks whether such an umbrella treaty can create a more focused global standard for both live animal export and import nations. It concludes that Australia must follow the lead of Brazil and New Zealand by crafting a new regime that protects the welfare of export animals, while simultaneously sponsoring the creation of a multilateral animal welfare treaty.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2015-11-23
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).